Friday, August 28, 2009

Review: Inglourious Basterds



Review: Inglourious Basterds
Rating: ***1/2
Nonna's Rating: $$$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 88%

Have you ever watched a "plot-to-kill-Hitler" historical drama and found yourself wishing that the end just might turn out differently from the end you know is coming? Well, then, do I have a movie for you! Inglourious Basterds (yeah it's spelled wrong) delivers the ultimate World War II revenge fantasy. Based on no facts whatsoever, Tarantino presents a masterful film that speeds by much faster than its two and a half hour length would suggest. It's Tarantino's best movie since Pulp Fiction -- and it occupies a pretty close second place. Tarantino never ceases to surprise, and he never ceases to employ over-the-top violence to make his point.

Much has been made of Christoph Waltz's chilling performance as SS officer and "Jew Hunter" Col. Hans Landa, an Aryan nightmare if there ever was one. He uses charm, cunning, and psychological pressure to get what he wants from those unfortunate enough to be in his way. His interrogation scenes are intense, uncomfortable to watch, and directed brilliantly by Tarantino. Brad Pitt as Lt. Aldo Raine (an homage to gravel-voiced Aldo Ray) and his band of Jewish American soldiers provide Tarantino's special brand of gore and comic relief.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Review: District Nine

Review: District Nine
Rating: ****
Nonna's Rating: $$$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 89%

A science fiction bug movie that transcends the genre, asking us to examine what it means to be human. The film, intense and uncomfortable, never backs away from the constant tension inherent in the situation. Shot as a documentary, the movie, as my friend Sue said, piles parable upon parable, challenging us to confront our deepest prejudices and to ask ourselves how far we would go were we Wikus Van Der Merwe, the main character deftly played by Sharlto Copley. The story ignites our collective memories of historical horrors: Apartheid, the Holocaust, Japanese World War II internment, the treatment of immigrants, and the Slaughter of the Innocents to name a few. The ending leaves room for a sequel, but the probable plot is all too obvious: they will be back and they will not be amused.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: Shorts

Review: Shorts
Rating: *1/2
Nonna's Rating: $
Rotten Tomatoes: 44%

If you are a male about nine years old who enjoys booger and fart jokes, you just may love this movie. Then again, you may not. As the adult who accompanied the child to the film, I found it excruciatingly difficult to sit through -- and I had had high hopes with John Cryer, James Spader, and William Macy each portraying adults with various levels of cluelessness.

The moral of the story is harmless enough: "Be careful what you wish for," but the out-of-sequence plotting of the movie is unnecessarily choppy and distracting. I was, however, rather fascinated by Jolie Vanier, pictured above, who plays Helvetica Black (named for a font?). She seemed to be channeling the young Christina Ricci as Wednesday in The Addams Family -- not entirely successfully, but she was trying. Whenever she appeared in a scene, the soundtrack chanted her name incessantly, something my grandson Max found very creepy. Do skip this one.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Monday, August 17, 2009

Review: Funny People

Review: Funny People
Rating: **
Nonna's Rating: $
Rotten Tomatoes: 65%

Anchorman, The Forty Year Old Virgin, Talladega Nights, Knocked Up, Forgetting Sarah Marshall, Pineapple Express. I've enjoyed quite a few of Judd Apatow's movies in spite of the gross-out humor being a bit much from time to time. But I endure it.

So, I was looking forward to Funny People. The over-the-top humor surfaces in the very first scene. I noticed that the men seated around me in the theatre laughed loudly. But soon, their jocular outbursts were just snickers, and then their laughter seemed to disappear altogether. As one critic pointed out, this is the most "adult" of Apatow's films. The laughs are quickly mixed with George Simmons (Adam Sandler) learning that he has a terminal disease and not long to live.

George becomes depressed while his personal assistant Ira, played by a slimmed-down Seth Rogen, does all he can to shore up George's resolve and his spirits. Ira has a sweet nature and is bent on doing the right thing. He's convinced that George might be better served by focusing more frequently on thinking of others before he satisfies his own needs. Until the end of the movie, however, there's seems to be no glimmer of hope for that possibility. So, finally, the film becomes a bit of a morality tale. Is it worth two and a half hours of Apatow?

No.

Wait for cable.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: The Time Traveler's Wife


Review: The Time Traveler's Wife
Rating: **
Nonna's Rating: $$
Rotten Tomatoes: 35%

If you've read my reviews for a while, you know I get rather impatient when people compare movies unfavorably to books -- especially when they complain about the omission of particular incidents or the alteration of bits of dialogue. Well, I'm about to compare a movie unfavorably to a book, but I will defend my right to do so.

I do believe that we experience two completely different art forms in movies and books and, therefore, should not sweat the small stuff -- like eliminated or added scenes. However, I do argue that we have a right to demand that movie makers not alter the intrinsic nature of a book.

I have two quibbles with this movie. First, the lesser quibble. I have never read a book in which life in Chicago was so vividly realized. While reading, I could almost smell the stale air from the sidewalk grates in downtown Chicago. In the book, Chicago is a fourth major character and totally integrated into the love story. So, I understandably anticipated some drop dead takes on Chicago streets -- a la the marvelous cinematography in High Frequency. Unfortunately, what we got, for the most part, was Toronto. Big oversight just to save money.

My second quibble is more serious. There is almost no chemistry between the time traveler and his wife, played by Eric Bana and Rachel McAdams. The book is a love story for the ages; the movie just doesn't approach that level of intensity. It's a disappointing film.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: Julie and Julia



Review: Julie and Julia
Rating: ***
Nonna's Rating: $$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 74%

Another great date movie. Especially for married couples. Yes, the movie is about a young woman, at loose ends about her life, who decides to introduce structure and discipline by recreating all the recipes in Julia Child's Art of French Cooking in a one year period. Layered in her story are slices of Julia Child's life in the decades after World War II when she was trying to find her own life's vocation. You've probably heard that Streep's performance as Child is a tour de force and absolutely delightful. It is. Indomitable Meryl portrays a woman of such infectious optimism, confidence, and complexity, we find ourselves fantasizing that we had been a guest at one of her dinner parties. Oh yes, there's the food too. Child did have something to do with transforming the way Americans shop for, prepare, cook, and consume food.

There's all of this, but the most poignant and effervescent moments of the movie are found in the portrayal of Child's relationship with her husband, played by Stanley Tucci. It is a marriage in which each partner shares equally in caring for the needs of the other -- equally in passion, love, and healthy independence. Unfortunately, there's one lingering effect of the movie: you will have an overwhelming desire for an expensive French meal as soon as it's over.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: 500 Days of Summer



Review: 500 Days of Summer
Rating: ***1/2
Nonna's Rating: $$$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 89%

Oh, groan! Another romantic comedy. But wait, neither Katherine Heigl, Jessica Sarah Parker, nor Jennifer Anniston is in it. There's hope. Indeed, there's more than hope. 500 Days of Summer is a delightful surprise -- beginning with it's title, which suddenly makes sense as we learn that "Summer" is a girl's name. The girl is played by the fascinating Zooey Deschanel who doesn't look, dress, or sound like the typical romantic movie heroine. Joseph Gordon-Levitt plays the male lead. I certainly didn't recognize his name, but I recognized his face. He played Tommy Solomon on Third Rock from the Sun, the "oldest" of the space alien Solomon clan -- definitely the most mature despite his teenage body. Gordon-Levitt's talents shone through in that series, but he earns the right to continue his acting career in lead roles in this movie. His character, Tom, is hopelessly in love with Summer, who just might not be that much into him. The film plays deftly with a reversal of the sexual stereotypes so prevalent in current romantic films. And, I don't want to give away much more. Just know that this is not a chick flick. It bound to delight men as well as women.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Tuesday, August 04, 2009

Review: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince







Review: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
Rating: ***1/2
Nonna's Rating: $$$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 83%

I wish that the producers of the Harry Potter films had decided that this book, like the final one, would become two movies. That probably would have prevented much of the whining about what was left out of Half-Blood Prince in the film.

I don't have a lot of sympathy for this kind of complaining. Translating from one art form (novel) to another (film) necessitates eliminations, additions, and transformations of the printed text. That's a given. That said, the makers of Half-Blood Prince did a fine job capturing the major themes and incidents in the book -- a book which, after all, is full of loose ends given that it is the penultimate installment of the series.

Many reviewers lamented the abbreviated final battle of the movie, a battle in which most of the major characters participated. The decision, according to industry information, was motivated by financial concerns (it would have cost a great deal to bring in major stars for a few scenes), logistics (getting them all there at the same time would have been almost impossible and delayed production), and similarity (to the final battle scene in the last book). They didn't want to pull out all the stops prematurely.

What remains of the book on film is entirely engrossing and quite satisfying. Several friends who have not read the books reported enjoying the movie immensely; the edited story hangs together well. Harry, Hermione, and Ron have matured into their roles, and the romantic themes that run through this movie add a new dimension to their characters. The adult Voldemort is absent from this film, but Helena Bonham Carter is deliciously evil as Bellatrix Lestrange, and the two boys who play Voldemort as a child and teenager deliver chilling, effective performances. If anything, the film whets the appetite for the final two installments. If only we didn't have to wait so long!

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Saturday, July 04, 2009

Review: Public Enemies



Review: Public Enemies
Rating: **
Nonna's Rating: $
Rotten Tomatoes: 64%

I was not bored by Public Enemies, the story of John Dillinger, but I was not engaged either. As the movie unfolded, the story was more episodic and disjointed than one might expect.

And then there are the inevitable comparisons -- to Bonnie and Clyde and The Untouchables. But Johnny Depp and Marion Cotillard, adept actors though they be, are colorless and two dimensional when compared to the charismatic lead characters of Arthur Penn's film. And Christian Bale, another gifted actor, seems trapped in a narrow role overshadowed by that of J. Edgar Hoover, played subtly with a hint of perversity by Billy Crudup. Needless to say, the film is also missing the vibrant supporting performances of the two earlier movies: those, for example, of Michael J. Pollard, Gene Hackman, Estelle Parsons, Sean Connery, Charles Martin Smith, Patricia Clarkson, Andy Garcia, and, oh yes, Robert DeNiro. In Public Enemies, the minor characters all seem interchangeable. Pretty Boy Floyd and Baby Face Nelson fuse together; you need a scorecard to keep track of who's who.

When all is said and done, I don't care about these characters, and I ask, "Why was this film made?" At the end of the movie, Dillinger sits in the Biograph Theatre watching (memorize this for Trivial Pursuit) Manhattan Melodrama starring Clark Gable and Myrna Loy. In the few seconds that those two appear on the screen, they emanate more charm, charisma, chemistry, and sex appeal than Depp and Cotillard manage to generate in all of Public Enemies.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: My Sister's Keeper



Review: My Sister's Keeper
Rating: **
Nonna's Rating: $
Rotten Tomatoes: 44%

In the past three years, while I was focused on things like theology and biblical exegesis, a whole genre of fictional literature passed me by: chick lit. Jodi Picoult, it seems, has churned out several novels which focus on children in peril and parents in extremis. One is now a film: My Sister's Keeper.

I have not cried so much during a movie in a long time. It's a six-hankie weeper for sure. I don't mind a good cry, but I do mind feeling manipulated by what one critic called, "clunky voice overs, corny music, and maudlin montages."

The story, however, does present a solid ethical problem: Anna, the youngest child has been genetically engineered to supply her leukemic sister the stem cells and bone marrow necessary to keep that sister alive. When it becomes clear that Anna's sister needs one of her kidneys in order to survive, Anna balks and hires a successful litigator to argue that she alone has the right to decide how her body will be used. It's a compelling dilemma, but, in the end, through a plot twist, the movie does not contend with that ethical issue head on. I am told that as dissatisfying as this manipulation might be, it is not as frustrating for readers of the book as is the rewrite of the novel's original ending in the film. However, now that I know what that original ending is (I won't spoil it just in case you want to read the book), I'm really glad the film didn't go there. I think I might have thrown popcorn at the screen.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Coming Attractions: Alice in Wonderland







I certainly have been known to get excited about upcoming films. I'm eagerly awaiting the new Harry Potter, and I'm looking forward to Julia and Julie, The Time Traveler's Wife, and Yoo-Hoo, Mrs. Goldberg. I just came across these beautiful pictures from Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland which will be released in 2010. The first picture of Johnny Depp as The Mad Hatter just takes my breath away -- as did Anne Hathaway as The White Queen. Alice is played by Mia Wasikowska, whom some of you may know from HBO's In Treatment, where she played a precocious teenage gymnast. Helena Bonham Carter is The Red Queen. The promising cast also includes Stephen Fry as The Cheshire Cat, Alan Rickman as The Caterpillar, Crispin Glover as The Knave of Hearts, and Christopher Lee as The Jabberwock.

Sunday, June 28, 2009

Review: Every Little Step



Review: Every Little Step
Rating: ***
Nonna's Rating: $$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 91%

Put this documentary on your Netflix list because it didn't enjoy wide distribution and only remains at a few theatres (The Glen in Glen Ellyn being one). The documentary tells the story of (initially 3,000) dancer-singer-actors auditioning to appear in a musical (A Chorus Line) about dancer-singer-actors auditioning to appear in a musical. I am a sucker for dance movies -- probably because I have no terpsichorean talent whatsoever. That muse passed me by.

Features that make this film a delight: 1) archival footage of Michael Bennett's original interviews with Broadway dancers -- interviews that inspired the dialogue in the musical; 2) initially ragged-around-the-edges dancing, singing, and acting that becomes glorious by the end of the film; 3) the professionalism of the auditioning director et al.-- watching them make tough decisions and watching them handle the fragile egos of the dancers with care and sensitivity; and 4) the impassioned devotion to their art that so many of dancers exhibit.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth putting on your Netflix list
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: X-Men Origins: Wolverine



Review: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Rating: *1/2
Nonna's Rating: $
Rotten Tomatoes: 37%

Let me 'f'ess up to the truth right away. I went to see this movie for one reason only: Hugh Jackman. The reviews have generally been pretty awful, but I thought I'd give it a chance because I'd enjoyed the first two offerings in the X-Men series so much. Unfortunately, the reviewers have delivered very defensible negative evaluations of the film. The special effects are there; there's nothing schlocky about the production values, but the movie just doesn't have the heart and center of the first two films. In fact, my interest tellingly perked up at the end of the film when Patrick Stewart appeared as early mutants escaped to his protective care. The lesson learned is that one X-man does not a movie make: even if he's buff, beautiful, and a good actor.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it


Monday, June 22, 2009

Wordle Sermon

As a linguist, I am delighted whenever words are bent, broken, twisted, and otherwise delightfully tranformed -- and especially visually. I can't get enought of Visuwords, the visual thesaurus: http://www.visuwords.com/?word=happy. So, Wordle (http://www.wordle.net/)is my idea of the bees knees. I submitted my first Seabury sermon to the website, delivered on 2-22-08 -- one week after the traumatizing announcement that Seabury-Western Theological Seminary was ending its 150 year run of educating residential M.Div. students for the priesthood. We had no idea about our futures -- all of us: staff, faculty, and students. Since then, Seabury has begun to rise from its ashes like the proverbial phoenix -- solvent and healthy -- with a new mission and purpose.

Click on the image below for a better view:

Wordle: Seabury Sermon 2-22-08

Sunday, June 14, 2009

Review: The Brothers Bloom

Review: The Brothers Bloom
Rating: ***
Nonna's Rating: $$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 62%

I have always loved movies about the long and short con: The Lady Eve, The Music Man, Paper Moon, The Sting, The Grifters, House of Games, The Spanish Prisoner, Catch Me If You Can, and, oh, of course, Steve Martin's Dirty, Rotten Scoundrels. These are only a few of the titles in this surprisingly ubiquitous genre. Unfortunately, however, these films have predisposed us to skepticism whenever we watch a new film about a con artist. We know to take nothing at face value; we assume there is always more than meets the eye. Is a character dead? Probably not. The Sting ruined that surprise for us.

So, offering a new film in this genre is not for the faint of heart. The viewers expect to be surprised. We really don't want to figure it all out. We want to be conned. David Mamet did just that in House of Games. We didn't want to believe the ending. After all, the dead guy gets up, doesn't he? It's all a con, isn't it?

The Brothers Bloom does manage to surprise us -- to con us. We are finally amazed that we have been watching a love story all along, a story about the love of brothers as well as the love of a man and a woman. The director, Rian Johnson, manages the con predominantly through the stunning performances of his remarkable cast: Adrien Brody, not knowing what it is to live a life unscripted by his brother, Mark Ruffalo, a brilliant con artist, Rachel Weisz, a true, but entirely believable, eccentric, Rinko Kikuchi, silent and deadly, Robby Coltrane, a million miles from Hagrid, Maximilian Schell, diabolical and compelling, and Ricky Jay, the perfectly cast narrator.

The film loses some steam in the second half, but, overall, the con works. I'd like to see it again.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it





Review: Up




Review: Up
Rating: ***1/2
Nonna's Rating: $$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 98%

A lonely old man and a pudgy little boy travel by balloon-house to South America and . . .

Does this sound like a sure-fire plot for an animated film? Hardly. But it all works so beautifully. As we've come to expect from Pixar, the animation is stunning; the colors vibrant. My grandson Max and I chose to forgo the 3-D version, and we weren't sorry.

The "adventure in Venezuela" part of the plot is great fun with talking dogs, an exotic bird, a marvelous airship, and an evil nemesis. But it is the beginning of the film that I found most compelling. With few words, the movie recounts the story of the meeting, courtship, and marriage of Carl and Ellie Fredricksen: a union marked by unrealized mutual dreams and the sad absence of children. Ellie and Carl grow old together and Ellie dies, leaving Carl to his profound sadness. This story is told directly with the absence of sentimentality. To Pixar's credit, the film recognizes that Carl's sadness does not disappear, that it surfaces from time to time. Carl, however, is not paralyzed by his grief; he moves on to fulfill his and his wife's dream.

Death at the beginning of a Disney film has been almost formulaic historically, especially the death of a parent as in Bambi, The Hunchback of Notre Dame, The Lion King, The Little Mermaid, and Finding Nemo. In Up, death is treated realistically and appropriately for its intended viewers: impressionable children.

Max, by the way, thought the movie was terrific and far superior to Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian



Review: Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian
Rating: *1/2
Nonna's Rating: $
Rotten Tomatoes: 44%

When Max, my grandson, and I saw the original Night at the Museum movie, I went with low expectations. The film had only received a 44% Rotten Tomatoes rating. As we watched the movie, I thought, "Well, this isn't Citizen Kane, but I think it's going to be a big hit." Just the concept of being privy to historical figures coming alive in the night at a museum was enough to win me over. Yes, some of the jokes were sophomoric, but Max, then nine, was thoroughly delighted and I was thoroughly entertained. It was that rare thing, a live action movie for children that adults could also enjoy.

So, when the second movie, Battle of the Smithsonian, was released, I was eager to see it -- even though it again received only 44% approval from the Rotten Tomatoes reviewers. This time, I have to agree with the reviewers. The film, transplanted from New York to the Smithsonian, is a pale copy of the original. The new venue, so full of possibilities, simply offers nothing new in the way of plot or delight. The movie was tired and tedious. Although, to be fair, I must report that Max liked it -- and I do love Hank Azaria doing funny voices.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Saturday, May 23, 2009

Review: Entre Les Murs (The Class)






Review: Entre Les Murs (The Class)
Rating: ***1/2
Nonna's Rating: $$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 97%

In the past few years, I've gone to several French movies on the strength of almost universal acclaim from critics -- and I've been stunned by how much they overpraised the movies (see, for example, my review of Un Conte de Noel --A Christmas Tale). So, I approached this film with much trepidation, knowing only that 97% of 129 reviews reported on Rotten Tomatoes were positive, if not glowing.

My unequivocal admiration for this film has come in two stages. In the first phase, I found the film totally engrossing. Yes, in a past life, I was a teacher, so, like most teachers, I love to watch classroom-centered dramas. But this is a school story different from any I have ever seen. Set in a multi-ethnic Parisian high school replete with belligerent students, we might expect To Sir, With Love or Dangerous Minds -- dramas in which the earnest young teacher struggles at first but eventually wins the hearts and minds of his or her recalcitrant charges. Francois, the film's young teacher does struggle -- and he continues to struggle at the end of the film. There are small triumphs; there are probable tragedies. He's a good teacher, teasing marvelous stuff out of his students. He's a human, flawed teacher, engaging too often in verbal battles with his class and, on one utterly frustrating occasion, saying something he never should have said.

There are also scenes in the teacher's lounge where the faculty talk about their students and their frustrations. We here see that Francois is probably selling his students a bit short. The history teacher tells him he's covering the Ancien Regime in class and suggests Francois' students might read a little Voltaire, possibly Candide. Francois rejects the idea; he believes they are not capable of dealing with such texts. Yet later, one of Francois' least erudite students reports ingenuously that she has been reading The Republic. In scenes in which teachers formally review their students' performances, two students sit on the review council (actually mandated by French school policy). This representation is borne of good, if muddleheaded, intentions, certainly, but the bad behavior of the representatives has long range disastrous consequences.

On a personal note, I was naively surprised by how difficult it was for me to understand the French spoken in the film As a linguist, I should have been particularly aware of how much any language changes in 40 years -- the last time I studied French. On top of that, I only studied literary French (so when the students read from The Diary of Anne Frank in class, I had no trouble understanding the language). What this underscored for me was how futile it is for the French school system to persist in emphasizing the teaching of the conjugation of verb tenses that "only snobs use"-- imperfect subjunctive or passe simple, for example -- in the face of their natural disappearance from spoken language. (Note: I apologize I have not figured out how to make accents appear in this text.)

Well, enough of a linguistic rant. The second phase of my admiration for this film occurred when I read how it was made. The teacher, Francois Begaudeau, who "stars" in the film actually wrote a book about his experiences in the classroom. The director, Laurent Cantet, spent a year filming him, his fellow faculty, his students, and their parents (cinema verite style), but this isn't exactly a documentary -- even though everyone in the film is using his or her own name. The director had them all improvising their interactions. What results is a remarkably honest, compelling portrayal of a year in the life of a Parisian high school. At no point do we note self-consciousness on the part of the "actors." See it. It's a treat.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Review: Angels and Demons


Review: Angels and Demons
Rating: *1/2
Nonna's Rating: $
Rotten Tomatoes: 37%

I'm really glad I haven't read the book this film is based on. I'm sure it's similar to The DaVinci Code. Long on plot, but short on substance, character development, accuracy, and logic. Because the film relies so heavily on plot twists, however, it did hold my interest. I never knew what to expect -- beyond deep, meaningful clues hidden in Bernini sculptures and obelisks.

Here's my issue -- and I'm trying not to incorporate SPOILERS: When we finally find out what REALLY IS GOING ON, the byzantine plan is so unnecessarily complex and dependent on a myriad of coincidences that it truly strains credibility. I mean, there must have been a simpler way of getting what he wanted. Donchathink?

Wait for cable. Or go see Star Trek again.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: Star Trek



Review: Star Trek
Rating: ****
Nonna's Rating: $$$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 95%

Those of you who know me will probably be disposed toward discounting my hyperbolic praise of this movie. After all, I do have a home office with Trek action figures on the walls. And, yes, I have been-- and always shall be -- a Trekker

But WOW! I kept realizing my mouth was hanging open during every exciting sequence in the movie -- and there were plenty of them. And I was with two friends who are not Trek fans, but they truly enjoyed the film.

Refreshing the franchise by playing with time travel and the timeline, J. J. Abrams, the director, manages to satisfy both viewers new to the series and those of us intimately familiar with the details of five separate television series and ten (I think) movies. Who among Trekkers didn't delight in Kirk besting the Kobayashi Maru scenario? (If you don't know what I'm talking about, don't worry. You don't have to know.)

The new (old) Enterprise crew manages to capture the idiosyncrasies of the original actors without becoming a trite parody. Zachary Quinto as Spock is particularly adept at conveying a Spock a bit green behind the ears -- if not his blood. There are new layers of complexity and a fascinating backstory here. Chris Pine as Kirk is even more impetuous than Shatner as the young captain. The predictably awkward beginnings of his storied bromance with Spock are handled with aplomb. Both characters grow and learn in this installment -- the first, I'm sure, of several.

See it on the big screen. Going to warp has never been so marvelously gut wrenching.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it