Saturday, May 23, 2009

Review: Entre Les Murs (The Class)






Review: Entre Les Murs (The Class)
Rating: ***1/2
Nonna's Rating: $$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 97%

In the past few years, I've gone to several French movies on the strength of almost universal acclaim from critics -- and I've been stunned by how much they overpraised the movies (see, for example, my review of Un Conte de Noel --A Christmas Tale). So, I approached this film with much trepidation, knowing only that 97% of 129 reviews reported on Rotten Tomatoes were positive, if not glowing.

My unequivocal admiration for this film has come in two stages. In the first phase, I found the film totally engrossing. Yes, in a past life, I was a teacher, so, like most teachers, I love to watch classroom-centered dramas. But this is a school story different from any I have ever seen. Set in a multi-ethnic Parisian high school replete with belligerent students, we might expect To Sir, With Love or Dangerous Minds -- dramas in which the earnest young teacher struggles at first but eventually wins the hearts and minds of his or her recalcitrant charges. Francois, the film's young teacher does struggle -- and he continues to struggle at the end of the film. There are small triumphs; there are probable tragedies. He's a good teacher, teasing marvelous stuff out of his students. He's a human, flawed teacher, engaging too often in verbal battles with his class and, on one utterly frustrating occasion, saying something he never should have said.

There are also scenes in the teacher's lounge where the faculty talk about their students and their frustrations. We here see that Francois is probably selling his students a bit short. The history teacher tells him he's covering the Ancien Regime in class and suggests Francois' students might read a little Voltaire, possibly Candide. Francois rejects the idea; he believes they are not capable of dealing with such texts. Yet later, one of Francois' least erudite students reports ingenuously that she has been reading The Republic. In scenes in which teachers formally review their students' performances, two students sit on the review council (actually mandated by French school policy). This representation is borne of good, if muddleheaded, intentions, certainly, but the bad behavior of the representatives has long range disastrous consequences.

On a personal note, I was naively surprised by how difficult it was for me to understand the French spoken in the film As a linguist, I should have been particularly aware of how much any language changes in 40 years -- the last time I studied French. On top of that, I only studied literary French (so when the students read from The Diary of Anne Frank in class, I had no trouble understanding the language). What this underscored for me was how futile it is for the French school system to persist in emphasizing the teaching of the conjugation of verb tenses that "only snobs use"-- imperfect subjunctive or passe simple, for example -- in the face of their natural disappearance from spoken language. (Note: I apologize I have not figured out how to make accents appear in this text.)

Well, enough of a linguistic rant. The second phase of my admiration for this film occurred when I read how it was made. The teacher, Francois Begaudeau, who "stars" in the film actually wrote a book about his experiences in the classroom. The director, Laurent Cantet, spent a year filming him, his fellow faculty, his students, and their parents (cinema verite style), but this isn't exactly a documentary -- even though everyone in the film is using his or her own name. The director had them all improvising their interactions. What results is a remarkably honest, compelling portrayal of a year in the life of a Parisian high school. At no point do we note self-consciousness on the part of the "actors." See it. It's a treat.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Review: Angels and Demons


Review: Angels and Demons
Rating: *1/2
Nonna's Rating: $
Rotten Tomatoes: 37%

I'm really glad I haven't read the book this film is based on. I'm sure it's similar to The DaVinci Code. Long on plot, but short on substance, character development, accuracy, and logic. Because the film relies so heavily on plot twists, however, it did hold my interest. I never knew what to expect -- beyond deep, meaningful clues hidden in Bernini sculptures and obelisks.

Here's my issue -- and I'm trying not to incorporate SPOILERS: When we finally find out what REALLY IS GOING ON, the byzantine plan is so unnecessarily complex and dependent on a myriad of coincidences that it truly strains credibility. I mean, there must have been a simpler way of getting what he wanted. Donchathink?

Wait for cable. Or go see Star Trek again.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: Star Trek



Review: Star Trek
Rating: ****
Nonna's Rating: $$$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 95%

Those of you who know me will probably be disposed toward discounting my hyperbolic praise of this movie. After all, I do have a home office with Trek action figures on the walls. And, yes, I have been-- and always shall be -- a Trekker

But WOW! I kept realizing my mouth was hanging open during every exciting sequence in the movie -- and there were plenty of them. And I was with two friends who are not Trek fans, but they truly enjoyed the film.

Refreshing the franchise by playing with time travel and the timeline, J. J. Abrams, the director, manages to satisfy both viewers new to the series and those of us intimately familiar with the details of five separate television series and ten (I think) movies. Who among Trekkers didn't delight in Kirk besting the Kobayashi Maru scenario? (If you don't know what I'm talking about, don't worry. You don't have to know.)

The new (old) Enterprise crew manages to capture the idiosyncrasies of the original actors without becoming a trite parody. Zachary Quinto as Spock is particularly adept at conveying a Spock a bit green behind the ears -- if not his blood. There are new layers of complexity and a fascinating backstory here. Chris Pine as Kirk is even more impetuous than Shatner as the young captain. The predictably awkward beginnings of his storied bromance with Spock are handled with aplomb. Both characters grow and learn in this installment -- the first, I'm sure, of several.

See it on the big screen. Going to warp has never been so marvelously gut wrenching.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: The Soloist



Review: The Soloist
Rating: **1/2
Nonna's Rating: $$
Rotten Tomatoes: 55%

My, how I wanted to love this movie. It had two marvelous things going for it: Jamie Foxx and Robert Downey. And they do deliver. I couldn't take my eyes or ears off Foxx whenever he began to speak. His verbal gymnastics recalled for me painful, frustrating experiences with two homeless schizophrenics whom I had known from their youth: there again was the brilliant connectivity of seeming gibberish describing the world through the lens of mental illness. And Downey inhabited his role as a reporter the way he always does -- with subtle nuances and doubtless sincerity.

Ironically, the problem with the movie is its verisimilitude, its unrelenting attestation that life is just more complicated than that. Downey's character (Lopez) sets out to rescue Foxx's (Ayers), a brilliant cellist derailed by his schizophrenia. Lopez's intentions are good; he does everything he can. He believes he can make a difference. But, in the course of the film, he learns that he has no control of the outcome of his actions: Ayers is not "fixable." Finally, Lopez recognizes that all he can really do is simply be there for Ayers with no hidden agendas, no desire to fix him. The film is worth watching for that insight alone, but, unfortunately, that story doesn't make for compelling drama. So, be prepared for a somewhat unusual movie-going experience. Instead of being entertained, you will be asked to ponder and learn. And is that so bad?


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Sunday, May 17, 2009

Review: City of Ember

Review: City of Ember
Rating: **1/2
Nonna's Rating: $$
Rotten Tomatoes: 50%

I'm giving this movie a strong 2 1/2 stars -- and, if you're viewing it with a pre-teen, taking him or her to a matinee is a fine idea. Serious films for children are far and few between lately. This one presents a post-apocolyptic world filled with children who have learned to adapt to dire circumstances. It's a film that challenges older children to confront the consequences of profligate use of resources -- but the final message is one of hope.

The stunning visuals will captivate kids and keep adults interested if not mesmerized. Supporting performances by Tim Robbins, Martin Landau, and Bill Murray contribute to the solid story -- headlined by Saorise Ronan and Harry Treadaway, children who can carry the movie. Released last October, it makes for a good family night rental now.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: State of Play



Review: State of Play
Rating: **
Nonna's Rating: $
Rotten Tomatoes: 85%

Obviously, I'm the contrarian on this one. My expectations were high for this film. After all, Russell Crowe, Helen Mirren, Harry Lennix, and Jeff Daniels -- think of the possibilities. And, yes, Ben Affleck delivers a less than stellar performance, but he's not responsible for ruining the movie. The writers are.

It's a newspaper movie -- in the great tradition of All the President's Men , but falling far short of it. Crowe, paunchy and shaggy, plays a dissolute investigative reporter to a "T." Rachel McAdams does a passable job as the young, upstart blogging reporter. Helen Mirren is the crusty -- aren't they all?-- newspaper boss. The subtext of the byzantine plot is the speedy dissolve of the American newspaper as we know it and the rise of the Internet as the preferred source for news. But the film pays scant attention to this issue, resolving it by having Crowe and McAdams overcome their reporting-style prejudices and learning to cooperate to solve the mystery of "what is Ben Affleck up to anyway?"

At least, I guess they solved it. The ending left me with questions -- especially (and this is not a spoiler really) what the heck was that $26,000 about anyway? In a film like this one, ambiguity at the end is problematic; utter confusion is inexcusable. Wait for cable.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: Changeling

Review: Changeling
Rating: **
Nonna's Rating: $
Rotten Tomatoes: 61%

I decided to withhold judgment on this movie. After all, it was a Clint Eastwood film -- nevertheless, it did star Angelina Jolie, and I've never been wowed by her histrionics. And she did pull out all the stops (organ reference) for this one. After all, she plays the single mother of a kidnapped child -- a role made for scenery chewing cinema. When the child is returned to her with great fanfare by the LA Police Department, she insists that he is not her child while all around her insist that he is. An incredible nightmare. The story plays out and focuses on the venal, unbearingly corrupt LA Police, immortalized for their lack of a moral compass in films such as Chinatown, Mullholland Falls, and L.A. Confidential.

There are at least three places where the film should end -- but it goes on -- and on. Eastwood is faithful to the actual story; unfortunately, that doesn't make for good cinema. I found myself waiting to see what would happen next but ulitmately found the film dissatisfying -- like a too light lunch.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it