Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Review Avatar

Review: Avatar
Rating: ***
Nonna's Rating: $$$ (in 3D)
Rotten Tomatoes: 83%

For the first hour or so of Avatar, James Cameron's long-awaited science fiction film, I was enthralled. The visuals were stunning and the 3D complemented the storytelling (earning my 3 star rating). The movie unfolds as a visual tour de force. Then, about 65 minutes into the film, I came to my senses. The movie wasn't made for me; it was made for 12 year-old-boys. Not that there's anything wrong with that. The little dears will revel in the protracted battle scenes and the noise, and they'll be oblivious to the sad fact that Cameron writes some of the most stilted dialog ever filmed. (We are somewhat saved from groaning because most of lines delivered by the Na 'vi, the natives of Pandora, are in their language -- developed meticulously for the film.)

An even bigger problem, however, is that the storyline is as old as discussions of the "noble savage" -- a terminology wrongly attributed to Rousseau but nevertheless popularized in the 18th century as the concept that unspoiled "native" peoples are inherently more moral than those of "civilized" societies. As one critic pointed out, this film is basically a remake of Dances with Wolves. It's also a rehashing of too many off-world science fiction plots. It is one of the most predictable films I've ever seen.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Monday, December 28, 2009

Review: It's Complicated

Review: It's Complicated
Rating: ***1/2
Nonna's Rating: $$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 50%

Disclosure: I was predisposed to love this movie. Like Jane, Meryl Streep's character in the movie, I was divorced in 1999. Also, my ex-husband soon married a woman younger than I. And, like Jane, my life has taken off in a completely different direction from where it was going in 1999. I don't, however, live in Santa Barbara and my wasbund and Steve Martin aren't hovering around my front door. But, I was still absolutely delighted with this movie -- as I expect many women of a certain age will be. A strong, charming woman, comfortable with her celibacy, is suddenly pursued by two strong, charming men. It's not Citizen Kane, but it's a well-acted, well-plotted afternoon's entertainment with a strong supporting performance by The Office's John Krasinski.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Sunday, December 27, 2009

Review: Sherlock Holmes

Review: Sherlock Holmes
Rating: **
Nonna's Rating: $$
Rotten Tomatoes: 69%

I really, really wanted to like this movie. And I was able to discard my preconceptions -- based on reading Arthur Conan Doyle's fiction and viewing dozens of old movies -- of how Sherlock Holmes should be portrayed. But I was terribly disappointed in what I had expected to be great fun.

The acting is fine. Robert Downey Jr. portrays a moody (dare I say manic depressive) Holmes with considerable flair and physical ability (although I wish he had mumbled less through his brooding English accent). Jude Law was a refreshingly intelligent Watson, and the supporting cast did everything they were supposed to do.

The problem was the story: Sherlock Holmes meets Dan Brown. Please, filmmakers, bury the plots about secret, dark societies bent on sacrificing virgins and taking over the world. Ho hum. All the flashy martial arts battles in the world can't make up for trite story lines.

And Guy Ritchie quickly deflected his tease of a Holmes/Watson homoerotic relationship through Watson's engagement to Mary Morstan (Kelly Reilly whom I hope will appear in a much better plotted sequel -- there's a great untold story there) and Holmes seemingly unconsummated passion for Irene Adler, the only woman he pays attention to in any of Doyle's fiction.

In short, my dear Watson, it was something of a mess.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: Me and Orson Welles

Review: Me and Orson Welles
Rating: **1/2
Nonna's Rating: $$
Rotten Tomatoes: 84%

Add Tim Robbin's vibrant The Cradle Will Rock to Richard Benjamin's delightful My Favorite Year and you will get something that approximates Me and Orson Welles -- only most of what makes those two contributing films so fine is lost in the mix. The film focuses (in a manner of speaking) on the relationship of a high school student (played by Zach Efron) and Orson Welles' assistant (Clare Danes). But Zach must have skipped Chemistry in high school because there's certainly none here. The relationship goes nowhere fast and just doesn't hold our attention. The problem is Efron. He's pretty enough, but seems insubstantial in this movie -- a lightweight compared with everyone else. If there is any reason to see this movie, it is the performance of Christian McKay, who embodies a fully-flavored Orson Welles, warts and all. He's flamboyant, bombastic, brilliant, and a womanizer. He's downright charismatic and infuriating -- and you can't help loving him.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Review: Disney's A Christmas Carol

Review: Disney's A Christmas Carol
Rating: **
Nonna's Rating: $$
Rotten Tomatoes: 55%

I'm downright schizophrenic about this film. Let me list what I liked about it:
  • The animation is stunning -- even better than Polar Express. Dicken's London of 1842 is beautifully realized.
  • Robert Zemeikis captures Jim Carrey's expressive face perfectly. Carrey's voice is different enough from his own that we forget it's Jim Carrey almost immediately.
  • The Ghost of Christmas Past is an animated spooky flaming candle with an unsettling Irish brogue -- and I couldn't take my eyes off it.
  • The Ghost of Christmas Future was awesomely creepy too.
  • It's the scariest Christmas Carol ever. Yes, this is definitely a life-changing experience for Scrooge.
  • My grandson Max (12) loved it.
Now, what I didn't like about it:
  • Yes, Carrey's face was beautifully realized, but too many of the other characters looked like wax figures.
  • Stick to the story! There was a bizarre chase scene in which Scrooge was miniaturized and spoke in a helium voice. Totally distracting and totally superfluous.
  • It was too scary for Eli (5). He spent the whole movie with his hands over his eyes, even though I kept telling him no one would be hurt and everyone would be happy at the end. Much too much for a 5-year old.
Rent the 1951 Alastair Sim version. Far superior.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: Fantastic Mr. Fox

Review: Fantastic Mr. Fox
Rating: ****
Nonna's Rating: $$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 92%

Fantastic Mr. Fox, the much praised stop-motion film based on the Roald Dahl story for children, is a delight from beginning to end. I took my almost 12-year-old and definitely 5-year-old grandsons to see it and they both gave it thumbs up -- as do I. It's fast-paced and witty and features the voices of George Clooney and Meryl Streep (it made me want to see them play against each other in a "real" movie). More than anything else, the movie is full of whimsy -- and not many movies can make that wonderful claim. It simply delights with its burnished fall palette - oranges and dark reds and browns. The only green and blue I noticed were the eyes of Mr. and Mrs. Fox. And Wes Anderson, the director, to his credit didn't shy away from the more bloody aspects of being a fox in a world of chickens and ducks. If you have children, purchase this film when it appears on DVD. They'll love it over and over.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Sunday, December 20, 2009

Review: Up In The Air

Review: Up In The Air
Rating: ****
Nonna's Rating: $$$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 90%

The ads for this film seem to intimate that it's a romantic comedy. Don't believe it. It's seriocomic; it's a dramedy -- maybe -- but it's most definitely not a romantic comedy. The three principal actors are stunning in their roles. George Clooney completely redeems himself from the biggest mistake of his career: The Men Who Stare At Goats. He reminded me of the mature Cary Grant, so adept at conveying subtle emotions in spite of his beautiful face. Vera Farmiga as Alex, Clooney's love interest, portrays a powerful woman who is always in control --except for one very difficult moment. And Anna Kendrick is a revelation, a tiny, eager bundle of confident energy spoiling for a fall.

In the film, Clooney plays a terminator, spending the majority of his time in airports and airplanes as he travels from corporation to corporation "laying off" and "firing" people to spare the companies the grief. And, as a side business, he delivers business lectures about keeping backpacks light -- not having emotional attachments or commitments or too much stuff. He has an epiphany by the end of the movie, but even that must be reevaluated in light of a couple of smacks upside his head that follow. The director, Juno's Jason Reitman, avoids tying up the end of the film with a nice Hollywood ending. Instead, after having Clooney's character make a couple of life-altering choices, we see him ready to step into the future -- but we have no idea what that future will be. We can only hope.

This is a remarkably adult film for a Hollywood picture with an A-list star. It's funny, entertaining, sad, and jolting. The subtext is the devastating effect the economic downturn has had on millions of workers: those that are fired and those who do the firing.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: Invictus

Review: Invictus
Rating: ***1/2
Nonna's Rating: $$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 77%

The other day on NPR, I heard someone, who knew Nelson Mandela well, say that Morgan Freeman's portrayal of his friend in this film was downright unsettling: Freeman was not like the man; he was the man. Freeman brings to this role, as he's brought to so many others, subtlety and grace -- insights into another human life telegraphed by understated, simple moments of speech and action.

Clint Eastwood's film chronicles Mandela's attempt to break the cycle of violence and hate in South Africa. After years of Apartheid oppression, South African blacks were expected to take out their frustrations on the white minority who were no longer in control of the country. Mandela wanted to head off that impulse, to rebuild the society into one where forgiveness and reconciliation would be possible. He decided to use the Rugby World Cup to bring the country together. It's not a simple solution. He recognizes it will take time and patience, but he believes his vision is achievable and continually communicates that belief to all around him.

At the end of the movie, Eastwood signals that South African life is moving toward Mandela's vision, not by South Africa's underdog victory in the World Cup, but by the metaphor of the evolving relationship of one poor black child and a couple of white police officers. It's not a sports movie; it's a movie about the tough job of nation building and the remarkable man who chose to forgive and reconcile rather than hate and seek revenge.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: Precious

Review: Precious
Rating: ****
Nonna's Rating: $$$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 91%

Precious is a disturbing movie, unsettling because we know in some deep, hidden place within us that the story is too, too close to truth. The acting is raw and real. Nothing is prettified. When all is said and done, we are horrified that children can grow up in the complete absence of love, and amazed that they often do all they can to understand what love can be. The movie feeds our hope that there are idealistic souls who strive to help, but it is oh-so-obvious that there are too few of them and that they have neither time nor money nor power. Finally, we are left alone with our worst fears: in the end, the individual must save herself. A miracle must occur and only a few have the grace and power to do it. It's a very disturbing movie that ultimately asks how we can turn our faces away and pretend that the poor and uneducated aren't sinking deeper and deeper into the morass. I've been told that a common response to this movie is that such conditions just don't exist, that it's all outlandish exaggeration. Heaven help us.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: Pirate Radio

Review: Pirate Radio
Rating: **1/2
Nonna's Rating: $$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 60%

If you grew up with the music of the 60s (Stones, Kinks, Turtles, Procul Harum THE BOX TOPS), you will probably love this movie. Yes, some of the music used hadn't been produced during the time frame of the movie, but who cares? It's all fun. Wild, crazy, out of control, 60s fun. And you'll laugh out loud. Phillip Seymour Hoffman (adept at anything he pursues) and Bill Nighy (who never disappoints) are the icing on the cake.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Saturday, December 19, 2009

Review: An Education

Review: An Education
Rating: ***
Nonna's Rating: $$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 94%

Carey Mulligan makes this movie. She richly deserves her Golden Globe nomination. As a bright, curious English girl, assumed to be on her way to Oxford in the 60s, she has us all on her side. Not just hoping for her survival: we want her to triumph. And, oh yes, Peter Sarsgaard is no slouch either. Part of the magic of this film is that Sarsgaard seduces us in very much the same way he seduces Jenny and her clueless parents. We want (oh so much) to believe we have found the perfect, flawless, loving, genuine man that we know Jenny deserves. The fantasy ensues and then it unravels. And we're all a little older and a little wiser.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: Michael Jackson's This Is It



Review: Michael Jackson's This Is It
Rating: ***1/2
Nonna's Rating: $$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 80%

I was never a fan of Michael Jackson. I didn't even like the music of the Jackson Five. So, I went to this film under duress and as a favor (I'm so magnanimous) to my movie buddy, Linda. Well, I was mesmerized. Recognizing that hours and hours of Jackson's rehearsals were cut skillfully to produce this favorable portrait of the troubling, troubled star, I am still taken in by what I saw. The talent and the perfectionism are evident. He demands the best from himself and others, and demands it, not as a tyrant or martinet, but as a benevolent despot who repeatedly thanks all those around them for their hard work by saying, "God bless you." He doesn't say this in an affected or ingenuous way; he says it carefully, with sincerity -- as if he really means it. Ironically, he seems to be at the top of his game. If he is addled with drugs, he shows no signs of it. At the end, we still don't know who Michael Jackson really is, but we do know that a gifted, complex soul once moonwalked this earth.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: The Men Who Stare At Goats

Review: The Men Who Stare At Goats
Rating: NO STARS
Nonna's Rating: #
Rotten Tomatoes: 54%

George Clooney, Jeff Bridges, Ewan McGregor, Kevin Spacey. It should have been a great movie. It was one of the worst movies I've ever seen. Absolutely no point to it. A story that went nowhere. 'Nuff said.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Thursday, December 17, 2009

Review: Good Hair

Review: Good Hair
Rating: ***
Nonna's Rating: $$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 94%

I'm white and I have never understood the secret life of my black friends and their hair. This film has revealed a great deal to me -- and I'm appalled. I had no idea. Thanks to Chris Rock, I now understand that black people spend a lot more on their hair and spend a lot more time on their hair than I do. I was fascinated by this documentary, but, so far, none of my black friends have seen it. "I live it," each has said wearily. Chris Rock, a loud, brash comedian on stage, is very different as the narrator/interviewer of this film. He seems like, well, a regular guy. In one scene, he's in a barbershop listening to a group of African-American men talk about hair. He seems downright introverted as he listens attentively. And they aren't the least bit impressed by his celebrity. They treat him like one of the guys. I wholeheartedly recommend this film. It's full of humor and gentle satire.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: A Serious Man

Review: A Serious Man
Rating: ***1/2
Nonna's Rating: $$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 87%

I've never met a Coen Brothers movie I didn't like. (Well, I could do without Intolerable Cruelty.) A Serious Man did not disappoint me. I watched it in downtown Highland Park with two priests, two almost priests, and a smattering of older Jewish men and women who, like us, had probably heard that the film was a retelling of the book of Job. It's sort of a retelling. But no God. No Satan. All manner of ill befall the main character, but the Job-ness of the story is not what's important. If anything, the movie is similar in theme to No Country For Old Men: "No one, absolutely no one, gets out alive" -- which is kind of Job-like as I think about it. In essence, what happens to all of us is strictly arbitrary. The film is replete with delightful performances by largely unfamiliar actors. A personal note: I found the last scene incredibly chilling because I have been in exactly the situation depicted -- which, of course, it would be criminal for me to reveal.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: Whip It



Review: Whip It
Rating: *1/2
Nonna's Rating: $
Rotten Tomatoes: 83%

I'm the naysayer on this one. Why did this movie get such great reviews? It does have a terrific cast, roller derbies are intrinsically fascinating, and Drew Barrymore, actress and director, has always been the darling of the critics. But it clunks along. The pacing is uneven and the directing unsure. I tried to forgive it its flaws, but there were too many annoying aspects to this movie. And am I the only person who finds Ellen Page's smart aleck delivery annoying? I'm feeling very uncharitable about this movie. I'm just warning you not to waste your time.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: Bright Star

Review: Bright Star
Rating: ***1/2
Nonna's Rating: $
Rotten Tomatoes: 84%

Okay, I loved this movie. One of my examination areas for my Ph.D. was 19th Century British and American Poetry. Keats is, well, the bomb. And I had to memorize Bright Star in high school. During the credits of this movie someone recites Ode to a Nightingale -- the most Romantic poem I have ever read. I swooned. I loved every painful moment of Keats' frustrating relationship with Fanny Brawne. At the same time, I realize this movie was made to appeal to those weird people among us who can read Wordsworth's Prelude without wincing. So, I warn you. This movie is not for everyone. It's not a Jennifer Anniston romantic comedy and it doesn't have the airy charm of a Jane Austen movie. So, view it with my warning label. I loved it, but you may not. The cinematography is the most stunning I've seen in a long time.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: The Informant


Review: The Informant
Rating: ***
Nonna's Rating: $$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 77%

Matt Damon again shows himself to be a superb actor, but the pudgy schlub in this film surely can't be the guy in Bourne Ultimatum! In this film, Damon is a high-level corporate whistle blower at Archer Daniels Midland who exposes global price fixing. But, what seems pretty straightforward at first does, indeed, get a lot more complicated than that -- and a lot more fascinating than we might imagine. There's something very endearing about this very mixed up man. His FBI runners are so fond of him they carry around pictures of his him and his family. Make sure you rent it.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Sunday, September 13, 2009

Review: 9

Review: 9
Rating: **1/2
Nonna's Rating: $$
Rotten Tomatoes: 56%

9's first incarnation as a film was as a taut, Oscar-nominated short (2005: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IQcMeNh7Hc). For some reason, Tim Burton and others thought stretching Shane Acker's compelling narrative to eight times its original length would produce an even better film. What were they thinking?

Unfortunately, although the new film explodes in visual artistry and graphic intricacy, the protracted, centerless plot results in a nebulous storyline that ultimately dissatisfies. The longer film gives male an female voices to the once asexual, silent characters, adds a backstory, and introduces a new, even more horrific villain -- but these devices add little to the tight beauty of the original narrative.

Even odder is the introduction of No. 1, a kind of machine-bishop with mitre, crosier, and cope, who resides in a ruined cathedral. He's repressive and bent on keeping secrets from the rest of the band, but, aside from promulgating fear among the troops until 9 arrives to save the day, there doesn't seem to be much purpose for this plot addition. Finally, the new, Hollywood ending seems to promise that organic life will return to the planet and all will be well -- someday. Such an ending wasn't necessary in the original short; it's not necessary here.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: Extract

Review: Extract
Rating: **1/2
Nonna's Rating: $$
Rotten Tomatoes: 62%

Not many belly laughs in Extract, but there's plenty of well-executed situational comedy. Everyone in this film comes off somewhere on the continuum from "stupid" to "woefully ignorant." Jason Bateman, playing his usual nice, kind-hearted guy role, manages to make several poor decisions that even relegate him soundly to the "pretty stupid" category. Ben Affleck, whom I didn't recognize in his first scene, delivers his best performance in an eon. Perhaps Ben has a viable career in the offing as a second-banana character actor. But, I don't want to leave you with the impression that I disliked this film. I thoroughly enjoyed the gentle comedy. It was a lot better than most TV comedies, but not quite hefty enough for the movie theatre. I do recommend renting it for an enjoyable evening that will put a smile on your face.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Thursday, September 03, 2009

Review: Taking Woodstock


Review: Taking Woodstock
Rating: *
Nonna's Rating: $
Rotten Tomatoes: 52%

I really had high hopes for this movie. With Ang Lee directing, I expected a new slant on ancient history. And, indeed, the first half of the movie delivered. By focusing the story away from the main stage, Lee gave us an innovative take on Woodstock -- the story of how a series of unrelated circumstances conspired to create three unreproducible days of music and joy in August of 1969. There are engaging performances from Demetri Martin, the young, closeted good son to his Catskills-resort-owning parents, played uproariously by Henry Goodman and Imelda Staunton (yes, Dolores Umbridge). Liev Schrieber as cross-dressing, pistol-packing Vilma controls the screen whenever he's on camera, and Jonathan Groff is incandescently beautiful as the laid-back, smiling young thing who seems to function like a other-worldly guardian angel over the whole festival.

The second hour of the movie, however, devolved into the worst cliches of Summer of Love movies: the psychedelic acid trip accompanied by group sex and undulating graphics -- and the old folks stoned without knowing what hit them on pot-laced brownies. If those scenes had been edited out, the movie might have had a chance, but, as it stands, just catch the first hour on cable or skip it altogether.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Friday, August 28, 2009

Review: Inglourious Basterds



Review: Inglourious Basterds
Rating: ***1/2
Nonna's Rating: $$$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 88%

Have you ever watched a "plot-to-kill-Hitler" historical drama and found yourself wishing that the end just might turn out differently from the end you know is coming? Well, then, do I have a movie for you! Inglourious Basterds (yeah it's spelled wrong) delivers the ultimate World War II revenge fantasy. Based on no facts whatsoever, Tarantino presents a masterful film that speeds by much faster than its two and a half hour length would suggest. It's Tarantino's best movie since Pulp Fiction -- and it occupies a pretty close second place. Tarantino never ceases to surprise, and he never ceases to employ over-the-top violence to make his point.

Much has been made of Christoph Waltz's chilling performance as SS officer and "Jew Hunter" Col. Hans Landa, an Aryan nightmare if there ever was one. He uses charm, cunning, and psychological pressure to get what he wants from those unfortunate enough to be in his way. His interrogation scenes are intense, uncomfortable to watch, and directed brilliantly by Tarantino. Brad Pitt as Lt. Aldo Raine (an homage to gravel-voiced Aldo Ray) and his band of Jewish American soldiers provide Tarantino's special brand of gore and comic relief.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Review: District Nine

Review: District Nine
Rating: ****
Nonna's Rating: $$$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 89%

A science fiction bug movie that transcends the genre, asking us to examine what it means to be human. The film, intense and uncomfortable, never backs away from the constant tension inherent in the situation. Shot as a documentary, the movie, as my friend Sue said, piles parable upon parable, challenging us to confront our deepest prejudices and to ask ourselves how far we would go were we Wikus Van Der Merwe, the main character deftly played by Sharlto Copley. The story ignites our collective memories of historical horrors: Apartheid, the Holocaust, Japanese World War II internment, the treatment of immigrants, and the Slaughter of the Innocents to name a few. The ending leaves room for a sequel, but the probable plot is all too obvious: they will be back and they will not be amused.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: Shorts

Review: Shorts
Rating: *1/2
Nonna's Rating: $
Rotten Tomatoes: 44%

If you are a male about nine years old who enjoys booger and fart jokes, you just may love this movie. Then again, you may not. As the adult who accompanied the child to the film, I found it excruciatingly difficult to sit through -- and I had had high hopes with John Cryer, James Spader, and William Macy each portraying adults with various levels of cluelessness.

The moral of the story is harmless enough: "Be careful what you wish for," but the out-of-sequence plotting of the movie is unnecessarily choppy and distracting. I was, however, rather fascinated by Jolie Vanier, pictured above, who plays Helvetica Black (named for a font?). She seemed to be channeling the young Christina Ricci as Wednesday in The Addams Family -- not entirely successfully, but she was trying. Whenever she appeared in a scene, the soundtrack chanted her name incessantly, something my grandson Max found very creepy. Do skip this one.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Monday, August 17, 2009

Review: Funny People

Review: Funny People
Rating: **
Nonna's Rating: $
Rotten Tomatoes: 65%

Anchorman, The Forty Year Old Virgin, Talladega Nights, Knocked Up, Forgetting Sarah Marshall, Pineapple Express. I've enjoyed quite a few of Judd Apatow's movies in spite of the gross-out humor being a bit much from time to time. But I endure it.

So, I was looking forward to Funny People. The over-the-top humor surfaces in the very first scene. I noticed that the men seated around me in the theatre laughed loudly. But soon, their jocular outbursts were just snickers, and then their laughter seemed to disappear altogether. As one critic pointed out, this is the most "adult" of Apatow's films. The laughs are quickly mixed with George Simmons (Adam Sandler) learning that he has a terminal disease and not long to live.

George becomes depressed while his personal assistant Ira, played by a slimmed-down Seth Rogen, does all he can to shore up George's resolve and his spirits. Ira has a sweet nature and is bent on doing the right thing. He's convinced that George might be better served by focusing more frequently on thinking of others before he satisfies his own needs. Until the end of the movie, however, there's seems to be no glimmer of hope for that possibility. So, finally, the film becomes a bit of a morality tale. Is it worth two and a half hours of Apatow?

No.

Wait for cable.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: The Time Traveler's Wife


Review: The Time Traveler's Wife
Rating: **
Nonna's Rating: $$
Rotten Tomatoes: 35%

If you've read my reviews for a while, you know I get rather impatient when people compare movies unfavorably to books -- especially when they complain about the omission of particular incidents or the alteration of bits of dialogue. Well, I'm about to compare a movie unfavorably to a book, but I will defend my right to do so.

I do believe that we experience two completely different art forms in movies and books and, therefore, should not sweat the small stuff -- like eliminated or added scenes. However, I do argue that we have a right to demand that movie makers not alter the intrinsic nature of a book.

I have two quibbles with this movie. First, the lesser quibble. I have never read a book in which life in Chicago was so vividly realized. While reading, I could almost smell the stale air from the sidewalk grates in downtown Chicago. In the book, Chicago is a fourth major character and totally integrated into the love story. So, I understandably anticipated some drop dead takes on Chicago streets -- a la the marvelous cinematography in High Frequency. Unfortunately, what we got, for the most part, was Toronto. Big oversight just to save money.

My second quibble is more serious. There is almost no chemistry between the time traveler and his wife, played by Eric Bana and Rachel McAdams. The book is a love story for the ages; the movie just doesn't approach that level of intensity. It's a disappointing film.


Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: Julie and Julia



Review: Julie and Julia
Rating: ***
Nonna's Rating: $$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 74%

Another great date movie. Especially for married couples. Yes, the movie is about a young woman, at loose ends about her life, who decides to introduce structure and discipline by recreating all the recipes in Julia Child's Art of French Cooking in a one year period. Layered in her story are slices of Julia Child's life in the decades after World War II when she was trying to find her own life's vocation. You've probably heard that Streep's performance as Child is a tour de force and absolutely delightful. It is. Indomitable Meryl portrays a woman of such infectious optimism, confidence, and complexity, we find ourselves fantasizing that we had been a guest at one of her dinner parties. Oh yes, there's the food too. Child did have something to do with transforming the way Americans shop for, prepare, cook, and consume food.

There's all of this, but the most poignant and effervescent moments of the movie are found in the portrayal of Child's relationship with her husband, played by Stanley Tucci. It is a marriage in which each partner shares equally in caring for the needs of the other -- equally in passion, love, and healthy independence. Unfortunately, there's one lingering effect of the movie: you will have an overwhelming desire for an expensive French meal as soon as it's over.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Review: 500 Days of Summer



Review: 500 Days of Summer
Rating: ***1/2
Nonna's Rating: $$$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 89%

Oh, groan! Another romantic comedy. But wait, neither Katherine Heigl, Jessica Sarah Parker, nor Jennifer Anniston is in it. There's hope. Indeed, there's more than hope. 500 Days of Summer is a delightful surprise -- beginning with it's title, which suddenly makes sense as we learn that "Summer" is a girl's name. The girl is played by the fascinating Zooey Deschanel who doesn't look, dress, or sound like the typical romantic movie heroine. Joseph Gordon-Levitt plays the male lead. I certainly didn't recognize his name, but I recognized his face. He played Tommy Solomon on Third Rock from the Sun, the "oldest" of the space alien Solomon clan -- definitely the most mature despite his teenage body. Gordon-Levitt's talents shone through in that series, but he earns the right to continue his acting career in lead roles in this movie. His character, Tom, is hopelessly in love with Summer, who just might not be that much into him. The film plays deftly with a reversal of the sexual stereotypes so prevalent in current romantic films. And, I don't want to give away much more. Just know that this is not a chick flick. It bound to delight men as well as women.

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it

Tuesday, August 04, 2009

Review: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince







Review: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
Rating: ***1/2
Nonna's Rating: $$$$
Rotten Tomatoes: 83%

I wish that the producers of the Harry Potter films had decided that this book, like the final one, would become two movies. That probably would have prevented much of the whining about what was left out of Half-Blood Prince in the film.

I don't have a lot of sympathy for this kind of complaining. Translating from one art form (novel) to another (film) necessitates eliminations, additions, and transformations of the printed text. That's a given. That said, the makers of Half-Blood Prince did a fine job capturing the major themes and incidents in the book -- a book which, after all, is full of loose ends given that it is the penultimate installment of the series.

Many reviewers lamented the abbreviated final battle of the movie, a battle in which most of the major characters participated. The decision, according to industry information, was motivated by financial concerns (it would have cost a great deal to bring in major stars for a few scenes), logistics (getting them all there at the same time would have been almost impossible and delayed production), and similarity (to the final battle scene in the last book). They didn't want to pull out all the stops prematurely.

What remains of the book on film is entirely engrossing and quite satisfying. Several friends who have not read the books reported enjoying the movie immensely; the edited story hangs together well. Harry, Hermione, and Ron have matured into their roles, and the romantic themes that run through this movie add a new dimension to their characters. The adult Voldemort is absent from this film, but Helena Bonham Carter is deliciously evil as Bellatrix Lestrange, and the two boys who play Voldemort as a child and teenager deliver chilling, effective performances. If anything, the film whets the appetite for the final two installments. If only we didn't have to wait so long!

Nonna's Ratings:
$$$$ = Worth paying the Friday evening price
$$$= Worth paying the Matinee price
$$= Worth a rental
$ = Wait for cable
# = Skip it